Surely a contradiction here? If function is all that concerns you, you wouldn't refuse to wear anything that doesn't blend in with nature's colours . Sorry - in a bit of a pedantic mood
Not at all, I enjoy a bit of pedantism. What makes you think that colour isn't functional? Bright clothing serves the function of attracting attention, useful if you need to be rescued. Drab colours have the opposite effect, they serve the function of making you less visible, which is useful for avoiding bulls, farmers etc. and for discreet wild camping. Colour also affects mood. Bright garish colours are displeasing to my eye, I find them visually offensive in conjunction with the muted pastel shades of nature (please don't mention gorse bushes again). I like to look at colours which please me. I get pleasure from colours which blend in with my environment rather than those that contrast with it. Finally, another function of colour is to differentiate. In my early camping days I used to wrap everything up in plastic bags. It used to drive me nuts trying to find any particular thing since all the bags looked the same. Then I discovered Field & Trek colour coded stuff sacs (or whatever they're called). I bought one dark blue, one green, two red, two blue and two orange stuff sacs and have been using them ever since. I never have trouble finding anything anymore because each stuff sac has particular items allocated to it so I always know what's in each. Of course, these horrible garish colours are usually hidden away in my rucksack or tent so that they don't visually disturb the drab pastel environment. Paul Saunders